Home โ€บ Methodology: How the Sounds Were Chosen
Free ยท Works in your browser ยท No app to install

Methodology: How the Sounds Were Chosen

No magic frequencies and no lab-coat marketing โ€” here is the actual reasoning behind every sound on this site, and the limits of what sound can do.

Last reviewed: November 2026 ยท Sound guidance checked against Apple, Google and Samsung support documentation.

The physics in one paragraph

A speaker makes sound by moving a diaphragm back and forth. Two facts decide whether that movement can push water out. First, for a given volume, a diaphragm travels furthest at low frequencies โ€” excursion rises steeply as frequency falls, which is why bass is something you feel. Second, it cannot travel forever: below a small driver's useful range it mostly just heats up and distorts instead of pumping air. The useful cleaning zone for a phone speaker is therefore the low hundreds of hertz and below โ€” strong, clean cone travel without asking the driver to do something it physically cannot.

Why 165 Hz for water eject

The Water Eject mode centres on 165 Hz because it sits in that sweet spot for typical phone speakers: low enough for large diaphragm travel, high enough that phone drivers reproduce it efficiently instead of wasting it as heat. It is also in the same low range that measurements of the Apple Watch's built-in eject tones cluster around โ€” Apple's Water Lock feature is the existence proof that pulsed low tones eject water from a tiny speaker, and 165 Hz is our implementation of the same principle for phones, chosen from the physics rather than copied from any leaked specification.

The pulses matter as much as the pitch. A steady tone lets a droplet find a stable spot and sit there; short bursts with brief silences keep the surface tension breaking and re-breaking, so droplets walk toward the edge of the grille and out. That is why the water mode breathes โ€” roughly 2.4 seconds on, a pause, repeat โ€” instead of droning.

Where the other modes came from

The guidance our care steps are based on

The handling advice across this site (dry first, tap port-down, no heat, no compressed air, no rice, patience before charging) follows the published support guidance of the phone makers themselves โ€” principally Apple's support documentation on liquid damage and drying (including its advice against rice and against inserting objects into ports), Google's Pixel care guidance, and Samsung's Galaxy water-exposure guidance. Where makers differ, we follow the more cautious instruction. The eject concept itself is modelled on Apple Watch Water Lock, the one mainstream implementation of sound-based water ejection.

What sound can and cannot fix โ€” honestly

Good to know

Frequently asked questions

Is 165 Hz an 'official' frequency from Apple?

No. Apple does not publish the Watch's eject frequencies. 165 Hz is our choice from the physics of small drivers and sits in the range independent measurements of the Watch tones suggest.

Why not just use the lowest possible frequency, like 30 Hz?

Because phone speakers cannot reproduce 30 Hz with meaningful cone travel โ€” the energy turns into heat and distortion instead of air movement. Louder is not the goal; useful travel is.

Has this been tested in a lab?

No โ€” and we say so plainly. The approach is validated by the existence of Apple's own implementation and by basic acoustics, not by trials we have run.

Related tools & guides

We use cookies to keep the site working and, with ads, to keep it free. See our Cookie Policy.